Divorce Lawyer Amsterdam

What does a divorce lawyer in Amsterdam do?

A divorce lawyer in Amsterdam guides the legal process of a divorce through to the dissolution of the marriage and the settlement of the consequences. This includes choosing between consultation, mediation, or court legal proceedings, drafting or reviewing a parenting plan, and the division of community property or the settlement of prenuptial agreements. For divorces with an Amsterdam context, specific factors often play a role: real estate holdings or investments, a holding company or business interest, or an international partner or work environment.

In Simmelink files, we see that early legal exploration influences the outcome. Before a petition is filed, the choice between the route, reference date, and valuation moment remains open; thereafter, several choices become irreversible. We guide you through these considerations from our Maarssen office, on location in Amsterdam, or via secure video calling.

How are assets divided in a divorce for entrepreneurs in Amsterdam?

The division of assets in a divorce depends on the matrimonial property regime. In the case of community of property, Article 1:94 of the Dutch Civil Code serves as the basis; in the case of prenuptial agreements, the content of those agreements determines which regime applies. In Amsterdam, it is common for one partner to have a holding company with investments or real estate while the other partner married under prenuptial agreements with a periodic settlement clause.

In the case of prenuptial agreements with a periodic settlement clause that was not executed annually during the marriage, Article 1:141 of the Dutch Civil Code generally leads to an asset equalization as if there were a community of property. This significantly shifts the outcome when one partner has accumulated business assets. Regarding the valuation of a business, the valuation moment is practically irreversible once it is established in a petition. In Simmelink files, entrepreneurs more often opt for mediation with external valuation before formal filing to keep scenarios open.

What do prenuptial agreements regulate in an Amsterdam divorce?

Prenuptial agreements are arrangements that spouses establish before or during the marriage regarding their assets. For the divorce, the content determines which assets remain private and which assets are divided. Common forms include ‘cold exclusion’ (complete separation of assets) and prenuptial agreements with a periodic settlement clause (annual settlement of surplus income).

Upon divorce, it is verified whether the settlement clause was executed during the marriage. If no annual settlement took place, Article 1:141 of the Dutch Civil Code can lead to an asset equalization in accordance with community of property. Additionally, Article 1:87 of the Dutch Civil Code applies to reimbursement rights between spouses: investments from private assets into the other’s property lead to a reimbursement right equal to the contribution. In Simmelink files, we see that many divorces where assets are unequally divided ultimately come down to the execution of the settlement clause.

Which court has jurisdiction in the divorce of expats in Amsterdam?

In a divorce between partners with different nationalities or an international living situation, the Brussels II-ter Regulation (2019/1111) first determines which court within the EU has jurisdiction. The general rule is that the court of the country where both spouses have their habitual residence has jurisdiction, with additional criteria such as the last habitual residence, the petitioner’s place of residence, and the nationality of both spouses.

For expats in Amsterdam, this means in practice that divorce in the Netherlands is possible if at least one of the spouses has their habitual residence in the Netherlands. Regarding the divorce itself, Dutch law applies as a general rule under Article 10:56 of the Dutch Civil Code when the petition is filed in the Netherlands, unless a choice of law is made for the law of a common foreign nationality. Separate regulations apply to the consequences: the Matrimonial Property Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 for marriages from January 29, 2019, the Maintenance Regulation (EC) 4/2009 for maintenance obligations, and the 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention for custody and access. In Simmelink files, we always start international divorces with a choice-of-law analysis before legal proceedings, as the choice of court and law can significantly influence the outcome. If you are uncertain about your legal position, a second opinion can provide clarity on the route to be taken.

What does a divorce lawyer arrange when children are involved?

In a divorce involving minor children, the law (Article 815 paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure) requires that a parenting plan be part of the petition. The parenting plan describes agreements regarding place of residence, care distribution, contact with both parents, child maintenance, and the manner of consultation regarding important decisions. Joint custody remains in place after divorce based on Article 1:251 of the Dutch Civil Code; only the actual care distribution changes.

When parents cannot reach an agreement on a parenting plan, the court may decide whether a mediator should be engaged. For international families, the 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention additionally applies to jurisdiction and applicable law regarding custody issues. In Simmelink files, we see that a parenting plan started early, drafted in consultation and with mediator guidance if necessary, is often more sustainable in practice than a court-imposed arrangement.

Consultation, mediation, or legal proceedings for complex assets

In a divorce, three main routes are possible: consultation between lawyers, mediation with a neutral facilitator, or legal proceedings through the court. Which route is appropriate depends on the degree of agreement, the complexity of the assets, and the international context.

With complex assets, the considerations carry more weight than with a simple division. The valuation moment of a business is practically irreversible once it is established in a petition; the reference date for the asset equalization is also fixed after filing. In Simmelink files, entrepreneurs and holders of a joint holding company more often opt for mediation with external valuation before formal filing to keep scenarios open. If consultation or mediation does not lead to a solution, legal proceedings follow in which the court determines a division or instructs an expert to perform the valuation.

Practical examples

Three anonymized file patterns from our Amsterdam practice show how legal considerations take shape in conjunction with one another.

Director-Major Shareholder (DGA) with international holding

An entrepreneur from Amsterdam with companies in several countries requested guidance on the valuation of his business in the context of a divorce. The Brussels II-ter Regulation applied to the question of the Dutch court’s jurisdiction; Article 10:56 of the Dutch Civil Code applied to the divorce itself, and the Matrimonial Property Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 applied to the matrimonial property settlement. By working out various valuation scenarios before filing, the continuity of the business could be ensured within the process.

Periodic settlement clause not executed

In a file where one partner had built up a holding company with investments and the other was married under prenuptial agreements with a periodic settlement clause that was not executed annually during the marriage, the legal question came down to the application of Article 1:141 of the Dutch Civil Code. An asset equalization in accordance with community of property was at issue, instead of the originally intended separation of assets. The settlement required a choice-of-law analysis and a phased approach.

International family in Amsterdam

A couple with different nationalities and children at an international school in Amsterdam requested legal advice on jurisdiction and applicable law in a divorce. The Brussels II-ter Regulation governed jurisdiction; for custody issues, the 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention was leading. By first establishing the international legal position before making substantive agreements, uncertainty regarding jurisdiction could be avoided.

At the office or remotely

Guidance can take place at the office in Maarssen or entirely via secure video calling. For clients from Amsterdam, this often means an initial physical meeting for an advisory session in practice, followed by further consultation via video link when that is more efficient. Documents can be shared securely via a protected client portal.

Trust and quality

Simmelink Lawyers is affiliated with the Dutch Bar Association.
Read more about our reviews or see how we work via our working method.